ADDENDUM 2
WILSON 2000 PROJECT
Issued 10-01-98
The following questions requesting clarification have been received to date. The answer to the question has been italicized to distinguish it from the question. This Addendum 2 should be added to and incorporated in the Request for Statement of Interest and Qualifications issued September 1998.
Exhibit 2, Article 2.4.5 on page 28: What would be the definition of the "other services" referred to in this amendatory language?
"Other services" would be any services, as necessary, to effect the Change Orders and Construction Change Directives. The notion here is that the architect is providing the same services as otherwise provided under this agreement; that these services would also extend to change orders and change directives.
Exhibit 2, Article 2.6.6 on page 28: Will the contractor be requested to do the same?
If it is included in the Specifications prepared by the architect and accepted by the Board of Education prior to the solicitation for a general contractor, then "yes" the same will be expected of the contractor. The Board’s construction bid normally include standard AIA General Conditions of Contract spelling out the contractors obligations.
Exhibit 2, Article 2.6.14 on pages 29 and 30: Can the "as built" wording be changed in the last sentence of the amendatory language to "recorded"?
Yes.
Exhibit 2, Article 2.6.16 on page 30: "(…) When making such interpretations and initial decisions, the Architect shall endeavor to secure faithful performance by Contractor." What is meant by "endeavor" to secure?—the Architect does not have a contract with the contractor.
The last sentence of the amendatory language shall be replaced with the following: "When making such interpretations and initial decisions, the Architect shall provide copies thereof to the Contractor, shall promptly inform the Owner in the event that the Contractor protests or otherwise fails to comply therewith, and shall assist the Owner in securing faithful performance on the part of the Contractor."
Exhibit 2, Article 4.9 on page 31: Will the same be asked of the Contractor?
If it is included in the Specifications prepared by the architect and accepted by the Board of Education prior to the solicitation for a general contractor, then "yes" the same will be expected of the contractor. The Board’s construction bid normally include standard AIA General Conditions of Contract spelling out the contractors obligations.
Exhibit 2, Article 12.2 of the amendatory language on page 33 should read as follows:
Architect carries and will maintain claims made based Architect’s Professional Liability Insurance which includes Errors and Omissions Insurance and Contractual Liability Insurance in the annual aggregate for each occurrence of not less than $1,000,000 in a form and with an insurance company reasonably acceptable to Owner. (…)
Do you have scaled as-built documents for the existing building and will those be available? If they are available which portions of the work are included therein?
All available plans and documents shall be made available to the successful contractor; the District makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy or completeness of the drawings or documents.
At the meeting you stated that there would not be a CM as part of this work. Given that, it is appropriate to presume that we do not need to respond those portions of the questions related to a CM's role which appear in some of the schedules?
The district requests that you respond fully for informational purposes.
3. Does the District currently anticipate any separate consultants employed by the district with which we will need to coordinate work as indicated in Article 3, Item C3.2.4/3.4.9 on page 19? If consultants are anticipated, what specialtites are anticipatted?
No separate consultants have been retained at this time but the district reserves the right to retain the same as may become necessary. The District notes that the Architect shall be required to perform project representation as found at C3.1.1 of the Specifications, page 19.
In Article 4, Item E1.1/N.A. on page 20, line 4 the phrase "(including strike-through):" is written. What does this mean?
The standard Acord form has pre-printed language in the cancellation box. The phrase "including strike-through" refers only to the words that we require be stricken from this form.
Some landscaping is mentioned in the CDB project statement on page 26. However, no mention is made of landscaping as a separate optional service to be included. Is the district expecting landscaping to be included in these services and if so to what extent and will that service also be part of the 7% fee (or less)?
Yes, the District expects to have landscaping included and the same should be calculated as part of the basic services within the 7% figure noted in Schedule 1.
There is no specific mention of Asbestos testing and design services to be provided as part of these services. However at the meeting you stated that there is no ACM other than floor tile. That would suggest that those services should be included. Are they? If so will that also be paid for out of the 7% (or less) fee, or will that be a separate consultant hired by the owner?
To the extent that asbestos removal becomes necessary, the design and testing services shall be included in the basic services and shall be calculated within the 7% figure found in Schedule 1.
Schedule 3, item #3 on page 40-41: Does this question pertain to arbitration and mediation also?
Yes, insofar as mediation and arbitration involve claims in excess of $25,000.