Action Plan

GOAL: Address declining student population for 2001-2002.

RELATIONSHIP TO DISTRICT/ SCHOOL GOAL: Secure adequate human and fiscal resources and allocate them to fulfill our mission.

Task Force Goals

  1. Define and clarify the following issues: balance of student population and class size guidelines, equity of socio-economic demographics, Title I eligibility, projected enrollments, transportation needs, efficient and economic space utilization for needed programs and services, balanced budget.
  2. Develop multiple alternatives for establishing school residential boundaries that address the following: grade configurations, class size projections vs. enrollment projections, boundary descriptions, demographic comparisons, Title I eligibility comparisons, transportation implications, potential cost/savings.

WHAT?

What actions need to be taken to complete the task?

RESULTS?

What data or documents will indicate closure or success for each action?

TIMEFRAME?

When will each action be conducted?

WHO?

Who needs to be involved with each action?

RESOURCES?

What tools/strategies need to be collected, developed or organized to complete the task?

Identify specific concerns that need to be addressed in the boundary study—what exactly do we need to fix?

  • Annotated listing of issues that need to be considered when establishing school boundaries, including those that may not have been listed in the charge.
  • October – November 2000
  • Committee
  • Principals
  • SILTs
  • Finance Cmte
  • DILT Pre-K Task Force
  • Title I Coordinator
  • SpEd Coordinator
  • Needs assessment strategies
  • Reports of data needed for charge
  • Understanding of Edulog software as related to charge
  • Identify the available resources, e.g., facility space, busing capability, staffing levels, etc.

    • Annotated maps of all school buildings showing available classrooms for regular division, special education, exploratory curricula, as well space for various support services.
    • Projections of budget changes 5 years into the future.
  • October – December 2000
  • Committee
  • Finance Cmte
  • Business Ofc
  • Ass’t Sup’t
  • Title I Coordinator
  • SpEd Coordinator
  • Director of Facilities
  • Architects
  • DILT Pre-K Task Force
  • BOE decision between 2 strategies for reducing costs:
  • Program remains intact while class size rises, or
  • Class sizes remain small while program offerings are reduced.
  • Project space needs in terms of regular division and resource special education students, special education instructional students, rare special education populations, e.g., CBI, OT/PT, pre-K program, community partnerships, etc.

    • Enrollment projections for all identified groups of students.
  • January - February 2001
  • Committee
  • Business Ofc
  • Ass’t Sup’t
  • DILT Pre-K Task Force
  • Strategy for housing SpEd and support programming equitably across district.
  • Definition of "Wee Wilson" and its hosing needs.
  • Develop criteria and process for evaluating alternatives.

    • Description of criteria and steps to be used in evaluating alternative proposals.
  • January – February 2001
  • Committee
  • Master Edulog software tools to be used in evaluating the alternatives.
  • Develop multiple alternative proposals.

    • Description of multiple alternatives, including effects upon the identified criteria
  • March 2001
  • Committee
  • Junior High Faculty
  • DILT Pre-K Task Force
  • Edulog software models of the alternatives, complete with analysis of criteria.
  • Evaluate and select alternative proposals to present to superintendent.

    • 2+ recommendations annotated with +/è for each.
  • March – April 2001
  • Committee
  • Rationale for choosing among alternatives.
  •